Home » education, information literacy, students


8 September 2009 2 Comments


This is another one of my posts from the School of Education discussion forum.  I would be interested to read what other people think about this topic…

I think that the issue of Wikipedia is a non-issue. Why? Because you can not stop students from going there and why would you try to.  Rather, you must actively employ teaching strategies that ensure that they analyse and critique ANY source of information. Seemingly factual information can come from any source and usually will always contain bias. Therefore to me, if students have been asked questions that require them to think outside of the square and are engaging with the topic in an authentic context then Wikipedia is an excellent place to start as a ‘trigger’ for finding information. What is interesting also, is that if students do progress their understanding further, they may infact be the people who are able to go back and edit or add to the Wikipedia page on their topic.

I question why finding information needs to be difficult or time-consuming in order to make the learning happen. ie. I use wikipedia all the time as a starting place if I want to find information on a new topic - particularly if I know very little about that topic. It is instantly gratifying providing me with enough information to gather key words which I will then use in my searches to find more detailed information. Depending on the topic, perhaps at times a Wikipedia definition is all that is needed.

I know Wikipedia is a particularly contentious topic. But I think that we need to pick our battles with this one, when do we need students to find information quickly and when do we need them to get really, really indepth? Does there need to be different levels when searching for information depending on the desired outcome and what we want our students to do with this information? What do you think???

Image from Flickr - Will Lion


  • Anne Harrison said:

    Who is to say that just because something is published in a book it is true? Using a book or a newspaper article as a source of information is not necessarily more reliable than Wikipedia. AS you so rightly say, it is what the students do with the information that should be the key to learning.

  • Nigel Robertson said:

    Quite agree. People are scared of Wikipedia because it can take the power of information away from the few. Also, most folks don’t have a wiki mentality - if it’s wrong then change it. We’d rather say ‘Yes that was lovely’ to the waiter and then once we are outside complain how badly cooked the meal was!

    Wrote a post earlier in the year on same subject Wikipedia in academia

    Cheers, Nigel

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.